Skip to content
← Methodology

HARERA registrations

Permission to sell homes, from Haryana’s real-estate regulator (HARERA).

methodology version 1 · 3 October 2026

Where the records come from

  • Registered projects

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    The state register of registered projects, for the Gurugram and Panchkula benches.

    read: Every day at 03:30 IST. · haryanarera.gov.in ↗

  • Defaulter, cancelled, suspended and abeyance projects

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    One register under four headings. HARERA does not say which heading applies to a project, so Bhumiq says only that the project is on it.

    read: Every day at 03:30 IST.

  • Gurugram’s list of earlier registrations

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Gurugram bench

    The Gurugram bench’s own list of registrations made before 2020.

    read: Every day at 03:30 IST.

  • Registration applications (Form REP-I)

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    What each promoter declared when registering, including the DTCP licences and other approvals the project rests on. These are the promoter’s declarations, as HARERA holds them. Bhumiq has not verified them.

    read: Every Thursday at 03:00 IST.

  • Occupation and completion certificate record

    Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority

    HARERA’s dispatch record of the occupation, part-occupation and completion certificates promoters uploaded, and of registration extensions. HARERA keeps this record. It does not issue the certificates.

    read: Every Wednesday at 03:00 IST.

A record counts as this register’s own only when it was read from haryanarera.gov.in, hareraggm.gov.in, hareraggm.com.

How matching works

A row on your list is matched to a HARERA project only when two things on it agree. The registration number has to point to exactly one project. Then one more thing on the row has to point to the same project: its exact name, its developer (by registered legal name or a sourced alias) when that developer holds no other project, or the DTCP licence the project’s application declares.

A bare number of the form “N OF YYYY” is never enough, because HARERA numbers from 2017 share that shape with DTCP licence numbers. A name on its own is never enough either.

Anything short of two agreeing identifiers waits for a person on your team to decide. No language model is used, and no similarity score can confirm a match.

Bhumiq compares a registration’s expiry date, as the register prints it, with the date in India on the day you look. A date that has passed is shown as expired on the register as read on that day. It is not a finding of wrongdoing: promoters routinely apply for extensions.

What it leaves out

  • Haryana only: the Gurugram and Panchkula benches.
  • HARERA removes a cancelled project from its registered list. Bhumiq reads the cancelled register too. A project that drops off the list without appearing there is left as it was last read.
  • Complaints and orders before HARERA are not read. Its search sits behind a captcha.
  • Occupation certificates. In Haryana the issuer depends on where the building stands, and there are at least five: DTCP for a licensed colony, GMDA and FMDA in their own areas, a municipal corporation inside its limits, and HSVP’s Estate Officer in HSVP sectors. Bhumiq reads two records of them: HARERA’s dispatch record and DTCP’s register. A certificate missing from both is missing from those two records. That is not proof that none was issued.
  • A register page Bhumiq could not read is recorded as unread, never as an empty register.

What has been measured

Matching a list to the registers
tried: 5219 distinct numbers in every notation, 129490 rows
WRONG HIGH: 0 in 129490 rows
Measured on 3 October 2026 by Bhumiq’s matching evaluation, run over a synthetic register built to the shape of the live one (2,208 projects, 2,190 registration numbers, 3,140 licence numbers, every number in every notation the registers use). None of the 129,490 rows was matched with High confidence to the wrong entry. Another 90,131 rows were written to trip the rules, 31 kinds in all (a mistyped number, a licence number in the registration column, two companies sharing a name, a district cell that names no district), and none of them reached High. These are counts, not a rate. They show the matching rules hold at that scale. They do not show that Bhumiq’s copy of the registers is right: the same evaluation has not yet been run against the live register.
Alerts on registrations
Not yet measured. Alerts for a lapsed registration, one expiring within 90 days or one extended are not switched on yet.
Alerts on occupation and completion certificates
Not yet measured. A customer team’s inbox reports an occupation or completion certificate appearing on HARERA’s dispatch record, and a BR-VII or LC-IX that DTCP’s register links against the licence a project declares. How often these alerts are right is measured on production before any figure appears here.

The other registers →

Ask Bhumiq about this developer, project or sector.

Plain-language answers on HARERA filings, DTCP licences, occupation certificates and court records, every line carrying its government source and the date it was read.